|
Alpha
Nutrition Health Education
|
|
Animals
Food Allergy Course Work
|
Intestinal permeability testing in dogs with diet-responsive intestinal disease.
- Author
Rutgers HC; Batt RM; Hall EJ; Sørensen SH; Proud FJ
Address Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Royal Veterinary College,
North Mymms, Hertfordshire.
Source J Small Anim Pract, 36: 7, 1995 Jul, 295-301
Abstract Fifteen dogs with signs of small and, or, large bowel disease that
responded clinically to an exclusion diet were studied, using differential sugar
absorption as an objective parameter of the mucosal response to the diet. Intestinal
permeability and function were assessed by determining the urinary excretion ratios of
lactulose/rhamnose and xylose/3-O-methylglucose, respectively, following oral
administration of a mixture of these four sugars. Five dogs, all retrievers, were
tentatively diagnosed as having dietary hypersensitivity, based upon resolution of
clinical signs and normalisation of high intestinal permeability following an exclusion
diet and recurrence of signs (in four of five dogs) upon challenge with the original diet.
The fifth dog did not become symptomatic when challenged, but intestinal permeability
increased. The remaining 10 dogs were diagnosed as having food intolerance, based upon
clinical improvement on an exclusion diet, relapse on challenge with their original diet,
but lack of improvement in intestinal permeability. These findings suggest that a
differential sugar absorption test may be useful to determine the reasons for clinical
response to exclusion diets. Demonstration of increased intestinal permeability with
subsequent normalisation following an exclusion diet may be useful in the diagnosis of
dietary hypersensitivity, while persistent abnormalities in intestinal permeability are
suggestive of underlying intestinal disease and food intolerance.
Diagnosis and management of food allergy and intolerance in dogs and cats.
- Author
Wills J; Harvey R
Address
Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Leics, UK.
Source
Aust Vet J, 71: 10, 1994 Oct, 322-6
Abstract
This paper reviews food allergy and intolerance in dogs and cats. Adverse reactions to
ingested food components can affect many systems and can produce signs involving the skin,
gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract and central nervous system, and these clinical
signs are reviewed. Most basic food ingredients have the potential to induce an allergic
response, although most reactions are caused by proteins. In particular, dogs and cats can
become sensitive to cow's milk, beef, fish or cereal. Food allergy and intolerance is rare
in dogs and cats, although the incidence in practice is difficult to establish. Clinical
signs are quite variable, depending on the individual response, although the major
clinical sign is pruritus. Diagnosis can be difficult, as there is no single test
available to help the clinician to confirm or refute the presence of food sensitivity.
Diagnosis is based on dietary investigation in the form of elimination diets and test
meals. Elimination diets for dogs include lamb, chicken, rabbit, horse meat and fish as
sources of protein, with rice or potatoes. Successful elimination diets for cats include
lamb, chicken, rabbit or venison, with rice. Improvement in clinical signs while on the
elimination diet is suggestive of food allergy. The diagnosis should be confirmed by
feeding the original diet, with the development of clinical signs within 7 to 14 days of
feeding.
Specific immunological unresponsiveness following active primary responses to proteins
in the weaning diet of piglets.
- Author
Bailey M; Miller BG; Telemo E; Stokes CR; Bourne FJ
Address
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
Source
Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 101: 3, 1993, 266-71
Abstract
Young piglets weaned onto soya diets frequently develop
diarrhea which may have a
dietary and/or immunological component. Piglets abruptly weaned onto soya at 3 weeks of
age developed levels of serum IgG anti-soya antibodies almost comparable to those induced
by injection with soya protein in adjuvant at 7 weeks. In the piglets primed by feeding,
no significant further increase in antibody occurred after subsequent systemic injection.
In contrast, secondary responses were observed in age-matched animals, previously primed
by injection, and primary responses were obtained in previously naive piglets. The results
demonstrate the development of specific unresponsiveness to soya proteins in neonates fed
soya, despite the occurrence of an initial vigorous immune response to the fed protein.
Altered immune response to proteins fed after neonatal exposure of piglets to the
antigen.
- Author
Bailey M; Miller BG; Telemo E; Stokes CR; Bourne FJ
Address
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
Source
Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 103: 2, 1994, 183-7
Abstract
The weaning of piglets onto soya proteins at 3 weeks old normally results in an active
response to the fed protein, as determined by the appearance of serum IgG antisoya
antibody. This system thus allows the effects of manipulation on the response to a fed
protein to be studied. In animals previously given 1 g of soya protein at birth, the
magnitude of the antibody response to soya fed at 3 weeks was decreased, although similar
amounts of the fed protein could be detected in serum. In addition, the relative affinity
of the dominant interaction between antigen and antibody was reduced in these piglets by
almost an order of magnitude. By comparison, the ability of piglets given soya at birth to
respond to injected soya was not significantly reduced. These results indicate that the
regulation of responses to fed and systemic antigens is largely separate. Very early oral
exposure to antigen may affect the ability of neonatal animals to mount immune responses
to, specifically, fed proteins while leaving the response to systemic antigen largely
intact.
|